
A resident of Irmo, South Carolina, is raising concerns after the town council recently approved a controversial resolution supporting Ranked-Choice Voting.
Better Ballot SC, a โnonpartisanโ grassroots movement led by Nicole Sanchez, has reportedly been lobbying local officials across the state to adopt a dangerous election experiment known as โranked choice votingโ (RCV)โor, as they slickly rebrand it, โinstant runoff votingโ (IRV).
Under IRV, voters rank candidates by preference, and votes are reallocated through multiple rounds until a candidate surpasses 50%.
According to its website:
A concerned reader tipped off The Gateway Pundit about this disturbing trend, writing, โIโm very concerned about an organization, Better Ballot SC, contacting local officials in small towns to push ranked choice voting.โ
The Irmo Town Council, swayed by slick talking points about โsaving moneyโ and โmore voter choice,โ has now thrown its support behind this scheme.
โOur town council, Irmo Town Council, recently voted in favor of a resolution for โranked choice votingโ or as the organization calls it, โInstant Runoff Voting.โ They use talking points like it will save the town election money by not having a runoff and voters have more choice.โ
The current system in Irmoโwhere the candidate with the most votes winsโis simple, transparent, and effective.
You vote for your candidate, the votes are tallied, and a winner is declared. Done. No gimmicks, no tricks.
But apparently, thatโs not good enough for Nicole Sanchez and her crew at Better Ballot SC, who claim IRV will magically โfixโ elections by forcing voters to rank candidates in order of preference.
If your top pick doesnโt win, your vote gets shuffled to your second choice, and so on, until someone claims a majority.
โRight now municipalities have to choose between costly runoffs or risk their elected officials not securing a majority of winners, a common problem across the state,โ Nicole Sanchez said. โWith instant runoff voting, municipalities and voters get the best of both worlds: a way to efficiently find a majority winner without the drop off in voter participation and added expense.โ
Lexington Chronicles reported:
At the most recent town council meeting, the Town of Irmo officially passed a resolution supporting Instant Runoff Voting (IRV). The town wants the state legislature to allow towns and municipalities the option to use this voting system.
Irmo currently uses a plurality voting system, where the candidate with the most votes wins even if they donโt have a majority. This is the method used by 117 municipalities in South Carolina.
In contrast, about 150 municipalities in the state use a majority-runoff system. Under this system, if no candidate wins a majority, a second runoff election is held two weeks later to determine the winner.
Experts argue that Instant Runoff Voting offers several benefits, including saving time and money, promoting majority support, reducing political polarization and encouraging greater representation.
Under the current system, voters choose just one candidate. With IRV, voters rank candidates in order of preference. If your first-choice candidate doesnโt win, your vote automatically transfers to your second-choice candidate.
RCV has been criticized and rejected in various parts of the United States. In recent elections, voters in several states, including Nevada, Colorado, Oregon, Idaho, Arizona, Montana, and Missouri, have voted against implementing RCV.
Two U.S. statesโMaine and Alaskaโuse ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and federal elections. Maine implemented RCV in 2018, applying it to federal elections and state primaries. Alaska adopted RCV in 2020, using it for all state and federal general elections, except presidential elections.
The post Radical Ranked-Choice Voting Scheme Invades Small Town in America โ Irmo, SC Resident Sounds the Alarm appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Source: The Gateway Pundit
TruthPuke LLC hereby clarifies that the editors, in numerous instances, are not accountable for the origination of news posts. Furthermore, the expression of opinions within exclusives authored by TruthPuke Editors does not automatically reflect the viewpoints or convictions held by TruthPuke Management.